DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mems, 708 N.W.2d 526.

116 citing documents.

  • State v. Romine 757 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Romine 757 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    A district court has a “responsibility in overseeing and regulating courtroom conduct and procedure during trials, including criminal trials.” see also Minn. R. Gen.
  • Hannon v. State 752 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 2008
  • Hannon v. State 752 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 2008
  • State v. Outlaw 748 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Outlaw 748 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    But “[w]hat evidence to present and which witnesses to call at trial are tactical decisions properly left to the discretion of trial counsel.” ().
  • State v. Spence 742 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Spence 742 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    An appellate court’s review of a claim of insufficiency of the evidence “extends no further than to make a painstaking review of the record to determine whether the evidence, direct and circumstantial, viewed most favorably to support a finding of guilt, is sufficient to permit the jury to reach that conclusion.” -32 (Minn.2006) (quotation omitted).
  • Byers v. Commissioner of Revenue 735 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 2007
  • Byers v. Commissioner of Revenue 735 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 2007
    1147 , 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994); (“Prior adverse rulings by a judge, without more, do not constitute judicial bias.”).
  • Francis v. State 729 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2007
  • Francis v. State 729 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2007
    “What evidence to present and which witnesses to call at trial are tactical decisions properly left to the discretion of trial counsel.” ().
  • State v. Wright 719 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Wright 719 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Colbert 716 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Colbert 716 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 2006
    Our responsibility extends no further than to make a painstaking review of the record to determine whether the evidence, direct and circumstantial, viewed most favorably to support a finding of guilt is sufficient to permit the jury to reach that conclusion.” -32 (Minn.2006) (internal citations omitted).