Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kahn v. Griffin, 701 N.W.2d 815.

163 citing documents.

Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 733 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
But the Minnesota Constitution can be interpreted “to afford greater protections of individual civil and political rights than does the federal constitution.”
State v. Anderson 733 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 2007
State v. Anderson 733 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 2007
State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. Hanson 732 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. Hanson 732 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Soohoo v. Johnson 731 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2007
Soohoo v. Johnson 731 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2007
See Kahn v. *822 Griffin, (citing Bernal v. Fainter, 467 U.S. 216, 219 , 104 S.Ct.
In Re the Welfare of E.S.C. 731 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of E.S.C. 731 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Deegan v. State 711 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2006
Deegan v. State 711 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2006
As a general rule we favor uniformity with the federal constitution, but our state constitution may in some narrow circumstances provide greater protection for individual rights based on “language, concerns, and traditions unique to Minnesota.” (-98 (Minn.1999)).
Dunham v. Roer 708 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Dunham v. Roer 708 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
See, (mootness); (standing), review denied (Minn. Oct.