Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Disciplinary Action Against Brooks, 696 N.W.2d 84.
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Fairbairn
802 N.W.2d 734
Minn. 2011
“An attorney misappropriates client funds whenever the funds are not kept in trust and are used for a purpose other than one specified by the client.”
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Swokowski 796 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 2011
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Swokowski
796 N.W.2d 317
Minn. 2011
We impose sanctions “on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific acts of misconduct and any aggravating or mitigating circumstances, while looking to similar cases for guidance.”
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Garcia 792 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 2010
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Garcia
792 N.W.2d 434
Minn. 2010
We impose sanctions “on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific acts of misconduct and any aggravating or mitigating circumstances, while looking to similar cases for guidance.”
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Albrecht 779 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 2010
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Albrecht
779 N.W.2d 530
Minn. 2010
(“We generally impose ‘more severe sanctions when the current misconduct is similar to misconduct for which the attorney has already been disciplined.’ ” ()); d at 212 (explaining that repeated instances of similar misconduct are an aggravating factor in determining the appropriate discipline).
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Grigsby 764 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 2009
-
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Grigsby
764 N.W.2d 54
Minn. 2009
See, (imposing indefinite suspension, with no right to apply for reinstatement for two years, based in part on failure to cooperate with the Director); (citing failure to cooperate with the Director as a factor increasing the severity of the sanction to be imp
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Dedefo 752 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 2008
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Dedefo
752 N.W.2d 523
Minn. 2008
The appropriate sanction depends on four factors: “(1) the nature of the misconduct, (2) the cumulative weight of the violations of the rules of professional conduct, (3) the harm to the public, and (4) the harm to the legal profession.”
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Overboe 745 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 2008
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Overboe
745 N.W.2d 852
Minn. 2008
Aggravating Factors “[W]e consider a lawyer’s prior discipline and professional misconduct when determining the appropriate discipline for new misconduct” and “generally impose ‘more severe sanctions when the current misconduct is similar to misconduct for which the attorney has already been disciplined.’ ” ().
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rhodes 740 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 2007
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rhodes
740 N.W.2d 574
Minn. 2007
(Grzybek II); -88 (Minn.2005).
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Nelson 733 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 2007
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Nelson 733 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 2007
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Mayrand 723 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 2006
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Mayrand
723 N.W.2d 261
Minn. 2006
Finally, we have said that “[failure to cooperate with the disciplinary process constitutes separate misconduct warranting discipline independent from the conduct underlying the petition.”
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Knutson 711 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Knutson 711 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Day 710 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Day 710 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2006
- In Re Fagre-Stroetz 710 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2006
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Fagrestroetz 710 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2006
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Fagrestroetz 710 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2006
- In Re Fagre-Stroetz 710 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2006
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Rooney 709 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2006
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Rooney 709 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2006