Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of…, 731 N.W.2d 502.

113 citing documents.

In Re Request for Issuance of the SDS General Permit MNG300000 769 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
[an appellate court] will give deference to the agency’s interpretation and will generally uphold that interpretation if it is reasonable.” In re Annandale NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance, (Annandale).
In Re the Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas Utilities 768 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 2009
In Re the Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas Utilities 768 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 2009
We consider an agency’s expertise or special knowledge when: (a) the agency is interpreting a regulation that is unclear and susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation or the agency’s interpretation is reasonable, In re Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater, or (b) when application of the regulation is “primarily factual and necessarily requires application of the agency’s technical knowledge and expertise to the facts
Independent School District No. 12 v. Minnesota Department of Education 767 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Independent School District No. 12 v. Minnesota Department of Education 767 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
While we afford high deference to official agency action and interpretation of its regulations in certain circumstances, In re Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater (Annandale), we are not persuaded that this MDE complaint decision is owed that degree of deference.
Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 765 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 765 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See, e.g., In re Cities of Annandole & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issur anee for Discharge of Treated Wastewater, (discussing the fact that the federal Clean Water Act requires states to establish water-quality standards that will protect the health or welfare of the public).
In Re the Alexandria Lake Area Sanitary District NPDES/SDS Permit No. MN0040738 763 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2009
In Re the Alexandria Lake Area Sanitary District NPDES/SDS Permit No. MN0040738 763 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2009
“[A] regulation is ambiguous if it is unclear or reasonably susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation.” In re Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater (Annandale)
Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 755 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2008
Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 755 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2008
See In re Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance, -24 (Minn.2007); cf. Nat’l Cable & Telecomms.
Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc. 753 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 2008
Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc. 753 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 2008
When interpreting a regulation, we first determine whether it “is clear or ambiguous on its face.” In re Cities of Annandale Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater