Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Schallinger v. Schallinger, 699 N.W.2d 15.

64 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Peiliang Yuan v. Te Hao, and In re the Matter of: Te Hao … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Peiliang Yuan v. Te Hao, and In re the Matter of: Te Hao … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Becki Anne Suleski, f/k/a Becki Anne Rupe v. Ryan Michael Rupe 855 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Becki Anne Suleski, f/k/a Becki Anne Rupe v. Ryan Michael Rupe 855 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld Hare, n/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld Hare, n/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See, -44 (Minn.App.2006) (rejecting the requirement for finding of bad faith when district court found that maintenance recipient did not need retraining to support herself); (refusing to apply Car-rick where the district court found that the maintenance recipient was partially self-supporting and did not need maintenance because she had the ability to work full-time, but decided not to do so), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In Re the Marriage of Melius v. Melius 765 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Marriage of Melius v. Melius 765 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Here, the district court noted that wife had not “sought to have a finding of bad-faith underemployment made” but rather asked the court to “make a finding that [husband] has the ‘ability’ to earn $500,000 annually.” Wife argued, review denied (Minn. Sept.
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 739 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 739 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
( (holding that generally, issues not raised before district court will not be considered on appeal)), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Marriage of Rauenhorst v. Rauenhorst 724 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Marriage of Rauenhorst v. Rauenhorst 724 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
2(a), that she has the “ability to meet needs independently.” “In a dissolution action, a finding that a party seeking maintenance has the ability to meet needs independently by full-time employment is not an ‘imputation of income.’ ” review denied (Minn. Sept.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by