DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Azure v. State, 700 N.W.2d 443.

74 citing documents.

  • James Spencer, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • James Spencer, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    (“It is well settled that a party may not raise issues for the first time on appeal from denial of postconviction relief.” (quotation omitted)).
  • Raymond Darrel Pfarr v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • Raymond Darrel Pfarr v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    (“It is well settled that a party may not raise issues for the first time on appeal from denial of postconviction relief” (quotation omitted)).
  • Miles v. State 840 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2013
  • Miles v. State 840 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2013
    (" 'It is well settled that a party may not raise issues for the first time on appeal' from denial of postconviction relief.” ()).
  • Evans v. State 788 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2010
  • Evans v. State 788 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2010
  • Davis v. State 784 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2010
  • Davis v. State 784 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2010
    1(2); (holding that an argument is waived if it is raised for the first time on appeal of *392 a postconviction proceeding); Knaffla, 309 Minn. at 252 , d at 741 .
  • Carey v. State 765 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • Carey v. State 765 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • Brocks v. State 753 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2008
  • Brocks v. State 753 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2008
    (declining to consider postconviction appellant’s argument not raised before the postconviction court); -47 (Minn.2005) (declining to consider postcon-viction appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel as not properly before the court when it was raised for the first time on appeal from a postconviction court’s denial of relief).
  • Hannon v. State 752 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 2008
  • Hannon v. State 752 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 2008
  • Vance v. State 752 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 2008
  • Vance v. State 752 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 2008
  • Schneider v. State 725 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 2007
  • Erickson v. State 725 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2007
  • Schneider v. State 725 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 2007
  • Erickson v. State 725 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2007
    (holding that the fairness exception did not apply because the defendant “did not offer any reason in his post-conviction petition for not raising the ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims on direct appeal”).
  • Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
  • Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
    4 “ ‘It is well settled that a party may not raise issues for the first time on appeal’ from denial of postconviction relief.” ( , 494 n. 2 (Minn.1997)).