Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc., 702 N.W.2d 237.

38 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Raenard Romalle Douglas Minn. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Raenard Romalle Douglas Minn. 2025
do not constitute an endorsement of the reasoning of the court of appeals or the result reached in those cases.” Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.
Minn. 2024
But even if the Legislature does not explicitly direct us to look to the common law, “[w]e generally presume that a statute is consistent with the common law, and if the [L]egislature intends to enact a statute that abrogates the common law, the [L]egislature will do so by express wording or necessary implication.” Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc., (
Hiscox Insurance Company, Minn. 2023
But we are not bound by the court of appeals’ holding, see Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc., and we therefore expressly reject Sorchaga’s conclusion that filing an answer can constitute filing the “action” under Rule 5.04(a).9 9 Citing Rhein v. Rhein , Hiscox argues that filing an answer containing a counterclaim would satisfy the requirements of Rule 5.04(a
Paul Herlache, Minn. 2023
Although we are not bound by the precedent of the court of appeals, see Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc., d 237, 245 (Minn. 2005), in any event, the precedent cited by the court of appeals majority does not dictate the result that it reached.
In re the Marriage of: Marlo Renee Nelson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.
Minn. 2022
Of course, “[i]n enacting statutes, we presume that the legislature acts with full knowledge of existing law.” Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Elena Vladimirovna Tokarev v. Vladimir Efimovich Tokarev Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Elena Vladimirovna Tokarev v. Vladimir Efimovich Tokarev Minn. Ct. App. 2017
11 See Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc., (“In enacting statutes, we presume that the legislature acts with full knowledge of existing law.”); (“A designation of ‘permanent maintenance’ is a term of art which places the burden on the spouse obligor to demonstrate that a maintenance
Commissioner of Revenue, Relator v. Dahmes Stainless, Inc. 884 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 2016
Commissioner of Revenue, Relator v. Dahmes Stainless, Inc. 884 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 2016
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.
Todd Burt v. Rackner, Inc. d/b/a Bunny�s Bar & Grill Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Burt v. Rackner, Inc. 882 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 2016
Burt v. Rackner, Inc. 882 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 2016
See Dukowitz, d at 154 (“[T]he Legislature abrogates the common law only by express wording or necessary implication.”); Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc., (“In enacting statutes, we presume that the legislature acts with full knowledge of existing law.
Todd Burt v. Rackner, Inc. d/b/a Bunny�s Bar & Grill Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Dukowitz, d at 154 (“[T]he Legislature abrogates the common law only by express wording or necessary implication.”); Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc., (“In enacting statutes, we presume that the legislature acts with full knowledge of existing law.
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Minn. Stat. § 645.17(4); cf. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc., (“In enacting statutes, we presume that the legislature acts with full knowledge of existing law.”).
Terminal Transport, Inc. v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association 862 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Terminal Transport, Inc. v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association 862 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
7 We are further persuaded by Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc., in which the supreme court noted that MIGA’s obligations are subject to “substantial limitations and exclusions,” citing the exclusion of any claim made under a policy with a deductible of more than $300,000 as one example of a substantial limitation or exclusion.
Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 831 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 831 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“We generally presume that a statute is consistent with the common law and, if the legislature intends to enact a statute that abrogates the common law, the legislature will do so by express wording or necessary implication.” Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters 831 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2013
Mosloski v. Spencer 825 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Mosloski v. Spencer 825 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
See Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.
Helmberger v. Johnson Controls, Inc. 821 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Helmberger v. Johnson Controls, Inc. 821 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
See Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc., (stating that if the legislature declines to make any further laws on the subject, it is presumed to have done so with full knowledge of existing caselaw).
Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 819 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2012
Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 819 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2012
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.
Storms v. Schneider 802 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Storms v. Schneider 802 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.
State v. Milliman 802 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Milliman 802 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc., (MinnApp.
Mycka v. 2003 GMC Envoy, MN Plate RPG535, VIN 1GKDT13S432414651 783 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Mycka v. 2003 GMC Envoy, MN Plate RPG535, VIN 1GKDT13S432414651 783 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
ch. 570, art. 1, § 15, at 1953-56, because the legislature is presumed to enact statutes with full knowledge of the then-existing caselaw, see Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.
Seehus v. Bor-Son Construction, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2010
Seehus v. Bor-Son Construction, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2010
ch. 60C (2008)); Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.
In Re the Welfare of the Child of S.L.J. 772 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Welfare of the Child of S.L.J. 772 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.