Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dunham v. Roer, 708 N.W.2d 552.
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Northeast Concrete Products, LLC 756 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Northeast Concrete Products, LLC
756 N.W.2d 93
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying *106 continuance when appellant had ten months to complete discovery); -32 (Minn.App.2006) (holding that a continuance is not warranted when a party had approximately seven
- Peterson v. Johnson 755 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Peterson v. Johnson
755 N.W.2d 758
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
The statute requires proof of, first, “objectively unreasonable conduct or intent on the part of the harasser,” review denied (Minn. Mar.
- State v. Morin 736 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
State v. Morin
736 N.W.2d 691
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(holding that defendant’s lies to police, although they may have interrupted or prolonged the investigation, did not physically obstruct the officers and, therefore, did not constitute obstruction of legal process); (stating that due process requires a criminal statute define an offense with sufficient definiteness that persons of ordinary intelligence can understand what conduct is prohibited and that arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement is not encouraged), review denied (Minn. Mar.
- Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms 719 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms
719 N.W.2d 226
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
See, (holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by denying continuance when appellant had ten months to complete discovery on claims that were not overly complicated), review denied (Minn. Mar.