Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of T.L.S., 713 N.W.2d 877.

24 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Robert James Cerney, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In support of that argument, the state cites
State of Minnesota v. Kissie Marie Haynes Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(holding that boisterous or noisy conduct may trigger punishment without offending the First Amendment because it is not the speech itself but the manner of delivery); see also Hensel, d at 176-77.
State of Minnesota v. Larry Cregg Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(noting that “or” is generally disjunctive); (noting that manner of speaking, independent of content, may 8 trigger disorderly conduct statute); cf. S.L.J., d at 419, n.6 (noting that conduct alone would have warranted disorderly conduct conviction in prior case).
State of Minnesota v. Thanantos Lee Ashing Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Michael Kuchenbecker Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1(3) (2016); and (“[T]he statute may be applied to punish the manner of delivery of speech when the disorderly nature of the speech does not depend on its content.”).
State of Minnesota v. David Paul Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In response, the state cites in which we concluded that a person may, consistent with the First Amendment, be found guilty under the state disorderly conduct statute for verbal conduct that is not in the nature of fighting words.
State of Minnesota v. Chad Harold Krueger Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. John Melvin Karnes Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In 6 re Welfare of T.L.S.
State of Minnesota v. Irene Bernice Benjamin Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Irene Bernice Benjamin Minn. Ct. App. 2017
We have distinguished between the criminalization of “mere speech,” S.L.J., d at 420, or “words alone,” and the criminalization of actions that include but are not limited to speech, as follows: Although [under S.L.J.]
State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne Hensel 874 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne Hensel 874 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tondalia Dubose Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tondalia Dubose Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(quotation marks omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Kevin Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Kevin Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Donald Ernest Beckman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Donald Ernest Beckman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Although “the disorderly conduct statute prohibits only ‘fighting words’ as applied to speech content, the disorderly shouting of otherwise protected speech or engaging in other ‘boisterous or noisy conduct’ may still trigger punishment under the statute without offending the First Amendment.” d 877, 881 (Minn. App. 2006).
State of Minnesota v. Farah O. Farah Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Farah O. Farah Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Peter 798 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Peter 798 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
The state basically relies on one case to support its position that appellants’ loud yelling is not protected by the First Amendment, -81 (Minn.App.2006).
Minneapolis Police Department v. Kelly 776 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Minneapolis Police Department v. Kelly 776 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-06 (Minn.1977) (finding arrest unjustified under rule 6.01); (same), review denied (Minn. June 18, 2000); -82 (Minn.App.2006) (upholding arrest *769 of expelled student who remained uncontrollable in officer’s presence).