Cited by

(stating that in revoking probation it must be shown that the offender’s behavior demonstrates that he “cannot be counted on to avoid antisocial activity”).

See, (upholding probation-revocation decision when the district court continued a hearing to review the record and issued a thorough explanation for its decision).

cannot be counted on to avoid antisocial activity.” (quotation omitted).

(affirming probation revocation upon record showing offender’s “lengthy history of criminal activity and chronic probation and treatment failures”); (affirming revocation of DWI offender’s probation after offender failed to complete aftercare for

(affirming the district court’s revocation of Osborne’s probation “based on the severity of [his underlying] offenses and his prior criminal history”); Austin, d at 251 (stating that the court’s finding on the third factor should be based on “the original offense and the intervening condu

“The decision to revoke probation cannot be a reflexive reaction to an accumulation of technical violations but requires a showing that the offender’s behavior demonstrates that he or she cannot be counted on to avoid antisocial activity.” (quotation omitted).

(stating that probation revocation is generally appropriate when “the original offense and the intervening conduct of the offender [show] that confinement is necessary to protect the public, provide correction, or avoid unduly depreciating the seriousness of the offense” (quotations omitted) (emp

In particular, "[b]efore revoking a probationary sentence, a district court must: (1) specifically identify the condition or conditions violated; (2) find that the violation was intentional or inexcusable; and (3) find that the policies favoring probation no longer outweigh the need for confinement.” (citing Austin, d at 250 ).

“A district court has broad discretion in determining if there is sufficient evidence to revoke probation and should be reversed only if there is a clear abuse of that discretion.” (quotation omitted).