Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. McGrath, 706 N.W.2d 532.

82 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Wayne Joseph Simonson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Joseph Simonson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When determining whether a search warrant is supported by probable cause, we do not engage in a de novo review.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
5 “When determining whether a search warrant is supported by probable cause, we do not engage in a de novo review.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Alondre Ramone Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alondre Ramone Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When determining whether a search warrant is supported by probable cause, we do not engage in a de novo review.” d 532, 539 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When reviewing whether a search warrant is supported by probable cause, this court gives “great deference to the issuing judge’s finding of probable cause” and seeks only to “ensur[e] that the issuing judge had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Benjamin Jacobs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Benjamin Jacobs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“Because no other evidentiary basis for the charges in the complaints exists, we conclude that suppression of the evidence seized from the .
State of Minnesota v. Ejay Freeman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ejay Freeman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Erdmann Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gene Charles Walters, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gene Charles Walters, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When determining whether a search warrant is supported by probable cause, we do not engage in a de novo review.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Erdmann Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Contraband seized from garbage left for collection “can provide an independent and substantial basis for a probable-cause determination.” d 532, 543 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Fredrick William Bachman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Devon Griffen Seivers Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Fredrick William Bachman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Devon Griffen Seivers Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When determining whether a search warrant is supported by probable cause, we do not engage in a de novo review.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Torrence Cortez Epps Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Torrence Cortez Epps Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Larry Jermaine McCool Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Larry Jermaine McCool Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Andrew William Serres Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Andrew William Serres Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We also relied on McGrath, in which this court declined to hold that “garbage searches are per se unreasonable under Minnesota law.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State v. Holiday 749 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Ortega 749 N.W.2d 851 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Ortega 749 N.W.2d 851 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State v. Holiday 749 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
“When the likelihood of a successful prosecution is significantly reduced by the unavailability of the suppressed evidence, the critical-impact standard is met.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State v. Shriner 739 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Shriner 739 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See, e.g., State, -19 (Minn.1993)