DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Brown, 732 N.W.2d 625.

66 citing documents.

  • State v. Flowers 788 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 2010
    In reviewing a claim of insufficiency of the evidence, “we make a painstaking review of the record,” “to ascertain!
  • Minneapolis Police Department v. Kelly 776 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Yang 774 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Yang 774 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2009
    In assessing the sufficiency of the evidence, “we make a painstaking review of the record to determine whether the evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict, were sufficient to allow the jury to reach its verdict.”
  • Holt v. State 772 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
  • Holt v. State 772 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
  • Williams v. State 764 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2009
  • Williams v. State 764 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2009
    Actual bias “is a state of mind on the part of the juror, in reference to the case or to either party, which would prevent the juror from trying the issue impartially and without prejudice to the substantial rights of either party.” , 629 n. 2 (Minn.2007).
  • State v. Netland 762 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Tscheu 758 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 2008
  • State v. Evans 756 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 2008
  • State v. Evans 756 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 2008
    Because “[t]he impartiality of the adjudicator goes to the very integrity of the legal system,” we have recognized that “[t]he bias of a single juror violates the defendant’s right to a fair trial.”
  • State v. Everson 749 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2008
  • State v. Everson 749 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2008
    Errors that are structural “require automatic reversal because such errors ‘call into question the very accuracy and reliability of the trial process.’” ( , 448 n. 8 (Minn.2006)); see also Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 309-10 , 111 S.Ct.
  • State v. Ferguson 742 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Ferguson 742 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 2007
    To assess the sufficiency of the evidence, “we make a painstaking review of the record to determine whether the evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict, were sufficient to allow the jury to reach its verdict.”