Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Pendleton, 725 N.W.2d 717.
-
State v. Wren
738 N.W.2d 378
Minn. 2007
We have acknowledged that the district court’s ruling on a Batson challenge is to be given “great deference” because “the record may not reflect all of the relevant circumstances that the court may consider.”
- State v. Crow 730 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2007
- State v. Crow 730 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2007
- State v. Hager 727 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
State v. Hager
727 N.W.2d 668
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-31 (Minn.2007); Stempf, d at 355 ; -06 (Minn.App.1987), review denied (Minn. Jan.