Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lorix v. Crompton Corp., 736 N.W.2d 619.
-
Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co.
781 N.W.2d 858
Minn. 2010
To suffer an injury-in-fact, a party must allege “a concrete and particularized invasion of a legally protected interest.”
- Midwest Pipe Insulation, Inc. v. MD Mechanical, Inc. 771 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 2009
- Midwest Pipe Insulation, Inc. v. MD Mechanical, Inc. 771 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 2009
- Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co. 764 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2009
- Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co. 764 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2009
- Riehm v. Commissioner of Public Safety 745 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Riehm v. Commissioner of Public Safety
745 N.W.2d 869
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
“Standing is a legal requirement that a party have a sufficient stake in a justiciable controversy to seek relief from a court.”