A05-2178
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Skic v. Beverage Transportation Corp.
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 6, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT: /s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice
Semantically similar Other opinions on related ground
Ranked by cosine-distance similarity of voyage-law-2 embeddings — these read closest to this opinion's legal subject matter, not just by keyword overlap.
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A06-25 | Minn. | 2006-03-28 | Affirmed | Mundy v. American Red Cross |
| A05-2057 | Minn. | 2006-02-06 | Affirmed | Johnson v. LARAWAY ROOFING |
| A05-1697 | Minn. | 2006-02-23 | Affirmed | Wheelock v. TRILITE STONE |
| A06-22 | Minn. | 2006-04-26 | Affirmed | Phan v. RADISSON HOTEL |
| A05-2044 | Minn. | 2006-01-17 | Affirmed | Pratt v. Minn. Tex Investments & APCapital Group |