Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Estate of Barg, 752 N.W.2d 52.

63 citing documents.

Marriage of Angell v. Angell 791 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 2010
Frazier v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. 788 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Frazier v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. 788 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In re Speed Limit for Union Pac.
In Re Rosckes v. County of Carver 783 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Rosckes v. County of Carver 783 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Medical assistance, in turn, was intended to ensure medical care for persons who lacked the resources to pay for it, and “to be the payor of last resort.”
Meyer v. Nwokedi 777 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 2010
Meyer v. Nwokedi 777 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 2010
In Re the Estate of Grote 766 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Estate of Grote 766 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
The district court granted the parties’ motion to stay its decision until the release of pet.
Meyer v. Nwokedi 759 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Meyer v. Nwokedi 759 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“Congressional purpose is ‘the ultimate touchstone’ of the preemption inquiry.” (quoting Malone v. White Motor Corp., 435 U.S. 497, 504 , 98 S.Ct.
Gabler v. Fedoruk 756 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Gabler v. Fedoruk 756 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
6, 1996); (deeming issue waived when no notice of review was filed).