Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bjerke v. Johnson, 742 N.W.2d 660.

107 citing documents.

Gilmore v. Walgreen Co. 759 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
667 n. 4 (Minn.2007) (noting that broader issue of whether defendant has duty is generally question of law).
SECURA Supreme Insurance Company v. MSM 755 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
SECURA Supreme Insurance Company v. MSM 755 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(when the relevant material facts in a summary-judgment appeal are not in dispute, the district court’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo); Am.
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 749 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2008
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 749 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2008
I. “On review of a grant of summary judgment, we inquire (1) whether *45 there exists a genuine issue of material fact; and (2) whether the district court erred in its application of the law.”
Foss v. Kincade 746 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Foss v. Kincade 746 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2008