Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hankerson v. State, 723 N.W.2d 232.
-
State v. Jones
733 N.W.2d 160
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Guidelines II.D prohibits a court from imposing a sentence based on facts found by a jury.” see Shattuck, d at 147 n. 16 (stating 2005 amendments to Minn. Sent.
- State v. Boehl 726 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Boehl 726 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Spears v. State 725 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2006
-
Spears v. State
725 N.W.2d 696
Minn. 2006
Some aspects of Spears’s arguments were considered in a
- State v. Chauvin 723 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 2006
-
State v. Chauvin
723 N.W.2d 20
Minn. 2006
Moreover, at 240-241, 243 , 2006 WL 3026144 (Minn.2006), filed simultaneously with this opinion, that the retro-activity aspects of the 2005 amendments to Minn.Stat.