Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Enright v. Lehmann, 735 N.W.2d 326.

68 citing documents.

State v. Barrientos 837 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2013
When determining whether two statutory provisions are in conflict, ‘‘the two shall be construed, if possible, so that effect may be given to both.” (emphasis added) (quoting Minn.Stat.
Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-Delano 830 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 2013
Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-Delano 830 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 2013
Standing to bring an action can be conferred in two ways: "either the plaintiff has suffered some ‘injury in fact’ or the plaintiff is the beneficiary of some legislative enactment granting standing.” (quoting Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc. v. Minn. State Bd.
In re the Estate of Jones 826 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Estate of Jones 826 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Builders Ass'n v. City of St. Paul 819 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Builders Ass'n v. City of St. Paul 819 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
The doctrine of standing requires a party to demonstrate a “sufficient stake in a justiciable controversy to seek relief from a court.”
In re the Estate of Butler 803 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 2011
In re the Estate of Butler 803 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 2011
See Act of May 23, 1973, ch. 619, §§ 1-16, 1973 Minn. Laws 1472 -80 (adopting the Minnesota Multiparty Accounts Act); (explaining that the Legislature enacted the MPAA in response to "uncertainty in the law of joint accounts").
State v. Martinez-Mendoza 804 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2011
State v. Martinez-Mendoza 804 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2011
Richards v. Reiter 796 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 2011
Richards v. Reiter 796 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 2011
In Re Estate of Butler 782 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Savig v. First National Bank of Omaha 781 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 2010
Savig v. First National Bank of Omaha 781 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 2010
In their complaint, and argued that pursuant *338 to the MPAA, Minn.Stat.
Russell's Americinn, LLC v. Eagle General Contractors, LLC 772 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Russell's Americinn, LLC v. Eagle General Contractors, LLC 772 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“Under the MPAA, a joint account holder does not, without evidence of a contrary intent, own funds contributed by another party to the account.”