Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Theis, 742 N.W.2d 643.

440 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Charles Chuck Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dusty Lee Littledog Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Steven Anthoni McMorris-Rice, Appellant./li> Minn. Ct. App. 2014
McMorris-Rice also argues that “[he] did not admit a sufficient factual basis for the offense of ineligible person in possession of a firearm.” “A proper factual basis must be established for a guilty plea to be accurate.” (quotation omitted).
Robert Earl Pittman, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Earl Pittman, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eric Lee Budreau Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eric Lee Budreau Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Johosephat Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Johosephat Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
4 I. Hodges argues that because he “did not understand that the guidelines actually called for a lower sentencing range, his plea was invalid and should have been vacated.” “A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Evalyn Lia Bheaanu Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Evalyn Lia Bheaanu Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Klug 839 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Klug 839 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
‘We have recognized three requirements for a valid plea: it must be accurate, voluntary and intelligent.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Crump 826 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Crump 826 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Although it is a lower burden, the fair-and-just standard “does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).
Campos v. State 816 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 2012
Barnslater v. State 805 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Barnslater v. State 805 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Petersen 799 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Petersen 799 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
To be valid, a plea “must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (quotation omitted).
Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
The purpose of the factual-basis requirement is "to protect the defendant from the conviction of a greater offense by guilty plea than would have been possible had he exercised his right to trial.” , 589 n. 5 (Minn.2003)
State v. Lopez 794 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Lopez 794 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Batchelor 786 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Batchelor 786 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Raleigh 778 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 2010
State v. Raleigh 778 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 2010
Williams v. State 760 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Williams v. State 760 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Hughes 758 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2008
State v. Hughes 758 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2008
A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea once it is entered, but a defendant is allowed to withdraw a guilty plea “to correct a manifest injustice.” Minn. R.Crim.
State v. Verdon 757 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Verdon 757 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Munger v. State 749 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 2008
Munger v. State 749 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 2008
Anderson v. State 746 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Anderson v. State 746 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
And the supreme court has noted the distinction, stating that the fair-and-just standard “is less demanding than the manifest injustice standard.” (explaining that the right to withdraw a plea for a manifest injustice applies before or after sentencing but that a district court may allow withdrawal before sentencing on the lesser showing of a fair and just reason to withdraw).