Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc., 732 N.W.2d 324.

73 citing documents.

Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A fiduciary relationship is characterized by a ‘fiduciary’ who enjoys a superior position in terms of knowledge and authority and in whom the other party places a high level of trust and confidence.” Carlson v. SALA Architects, Inc., -31 (Minn. App. 2007) (citing Toombs, d at 809), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Highland Bank v. Mary L. Wyatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Highland Bank v. Mary L. Wyatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Carlson v. SALA Architects, Inc., review denied (Minn. Aug.
Glendalough Homeowners' Association v. Jovani Nassar, and third party v. Evermoor Community Association, third party Community Development, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Glendalough Homeowners' Association v. Jovani Nassar, and third party v. Evermoor Community Association, third party Community Development, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“We will not reverse the district court’s decision on attorney fees absent an abuse of discretion.” Carlson v. SALA Architects, Inc., review denied (Minn. Aug.
Nicole Curtis v. Jason Jenny Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nicole Curtis v. Jason Jenny Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Carlson v. SALA Architects, Inc., d 324, 327 (Minn. App. 2007), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Linda K. Yonak v. Hawker Well Works, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Linda K. Yonak v. Hawker Well Works, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Carlson v. SALA Architects, Inc., review denied (Minn. Aug.
Pat Ritter v. Auntie Ruth's Animal Care and Wellness, Inc. d/b/a Auntie Ruth's Furry Friends Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Pat Ritter v. Auntie Ruth's Animal Care and Wellness, Inc. d/b/a Auntie Ruth's Furry Friends Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Carlson v. SALA Architects, Inc., (“In selecting certain evidence over conflicting countervailing evidence; in ruling that [defendant’s] countervailing evidence was either not believable or not reasonable; and in giving more weight to some evidence, the court usurped the precise functions reserved to the jury under our syste
State ex rel. Swanson v. Integrity Advance, LLC 846 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State ex rel. Swanson v. Integrity Advance, LLC 846 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Carlson v. SALA Architects, Inc., ("We will not reverse the district court's decision on attorney fees absent an abuse of discretion.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
County of Scott v. Johnston 841 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
County of Scott v. Johnston 841 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
ANALYSIS I. Standard of review “We will not reverse the district court’s decision on attorney fees absent an abuse of discretion.” Carlson v. SALA Architects, Inc., review denied (Minn. Aug.
Swenson v. Bender 764 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Swenson v. Bender 764 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Carlson v. SALA Architects, Inc., review denied (Minn. Aug.
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Generally, a “fiduciary” is one who “enjoys a superior position in terms of knowledge and authority and in whom the other party places a high level of trust and confidence.” Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc., -31 (Minn.App.2007) (), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Campbell 756 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Campbell 756 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Generally, such a relationship exists “when confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other; and the relation and duties involved in it need not be legal, but may be moral, social, domestic, or merely personal.” (quotation omitted); see also Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc., -31 (Minn.App.2007) (“A fiduciary relationship is characterized by a ‘fiduciary’ who enjoys a superior position in terms of knowledge and authority and in whom the other party
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See, e.g. Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc., (concluding that no per se fiduciary relationship existed between architect and client), review denied (Minn. Aug.