Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Evans, 756 N.W.2d 854.

158 citing documents.

Evans v. State 788 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2010
State v. Larson 787 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 2010
State v. Larson 787 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 2010
6 The State contends that because Larson presented alternative perpetrator evidence regarding Andujar
State v. Andersen 784 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 2010
State v. Harlin 771 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Harlin 771 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Jury instructions are reviewed “as a whole to determine whether they fairly and adequately explain the law.”
State v. Underdahl 767 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 2009
State v. Underdahl 767 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 2009
In those cases, we have required “some plausible showing that the information sought would be both material and favorable to his defense.” State v. Hum- *685 mel, (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted); -73 (Minn.2008).