Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Goldman v. Greenwood, 748 N.W.2d 279.

359 citing documents.

Marriage of Welsh v. Welsh 775 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Amaral, d at 385 ; (stating that “we normally interpret the conjunction ‘or’ as disjunctive rather than conjunctive”).
In Re Instructions to Construe Basic Resolution 876 of the Port Authority of St. Paul 772 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 2009
In Re Instructions to Construe Basic Resolution 876 of the Port Authority of St. Paul 772 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 2009
Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen 767 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen 767 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
18, 1987); (stating that endangerment for purposes of Minn.Stat.
Sitek v. Striker 764 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Sitek v. Striker 764 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Schisel v. Schisel 762 N.W.2d 265 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Schisel v. Schisel 762 N.W.2d 265 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
3(b), (c) (2006), , 283 n.5 (Minn.2008), for the proposition that custody cannot be based on the condition that a parent live in a certain area, id.