Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite GRUNDTNER v. University of Minnesota, 730 N.W.2d 323.

28 citing documents.

Ashney Helleksen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Minn., (concluding that while “the timing of appellant’s termination and his allegation of improper conduct are unfortunate,” appellan t’s claim still fails because the termination was a “foregone conclusion”).
TE Miller Development LLC v. Corey Devante Jones, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
TE Miller Development LLC v. Corey Devante Jones, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Minnesota, (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of: Heidi Sue Heller, obo minor children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Minn., (quotation omitted); see Butler, d at 873 (applying this principle in an OFP appeal).
Debra Sakrison, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
of Minn. , (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802, 93 S. Ct. 1817, 1824 (1973)), review denied (Minn. July 17, 2007).
A. Darlene Gibson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
of Minn., d 323, 329 (Minn. App. 2007), review denied (Minn. July 17, 2007).
A Xiong, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minnesota , (applying McDonnell Douglas test in review of summary-judgment decision in retaliation claim under MWA) .
Moore v. City of New Brighton 932 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Moore v. City of New Brighton 932 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minn. , , 329 (Minn. App. 2007) (applying McDonnell Douglas test in review of summary-judgment decision in retaliatory-discharge claim under the Minnesota Whistleblower Act), review denied (Minn. July 17, 2007); cf. Cokley v. City of Otsego , , 630 (Minn. App. 2001) (applying McDonnell Douglas test to employer'
Daniel Everette Olean, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Jeffrey P. Kirk v. State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeffrey P. Kirk v. State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Barbara Peterson v. HealthEast Woodwinds Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Barbara Peterson v. HealthEast Woodwinds Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Stores, 638 F.3d 984, 999 (8th Cir. 2011) (applying McDonnell-Douglas test to FMLA claim); d 323, 329 (Minn. App. 2007) (applying McDonnell-Douglas test to whistleblower claim); Phipps, d at 572 (applying McDonnell-Douglas test to claim of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy).
Nancy Salscheider v. Allina Health System d/b/a Allina Hospitals & Clinics Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Nancy Salscheider v. Allina Health System d/b/a Allina Hospitals & Clinics Minn. Ct. App. 2014
of Minn., see also McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-03, 93 S. Ct. 1817, 1824 (1973).
Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 813 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 813 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
of Minn., (stating that whether a court has subject-matter jurisdiction is a question of law reviewed de novo).
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 784 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2010
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 784 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2010
of Minn., Gee v. Minn. State Colls.
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Williams v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV. 763 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Williams v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV. 763 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
of Minn., (cit *652 ing Willis, d at 282 ).
In Re the Expulsion of N.Y.B. 750 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Expulsion of N.Y.B. 750 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
of Minn., (stating that appellant must provide record “sufficient to show the alleged errors”).
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2008