Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Fleming, 724 N.W.2d 537.

31 citing documents.

Vaundell Duwayne Kingbird, Minn. 2022
1b, makes it a crime for a person convicted of a crime of violence to possess a firearm.2 541 (Minn. App. 2006) (holding that a BB gun is a firearm under Minn. Stat. § 624.713, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Lue Yang 887 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lue Yang 887 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
When Yang moved for a judgment of acquittal, counsel for both parties acknowledged this court’s
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 886 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 886 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 2016
In the second case, the statute at issue was Minn. Stat. § 624.713, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Clyde Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robert Jamal Poole Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Claude Monroe Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Clyde Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Claude Monroe Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robert Jamal Poole Minn. Ct. App. 2016
this court held that the definition of “firearm” in Minn. Stat. § 624.713, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Darrell Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Darrell Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
1(b) (2004), which prohibited possession of a firearm by a person convicted of a crime of violence.1
State of Minnesota v. Delbert Keith Sybrandt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Delbert Keith Sybrandt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Mayl 836 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Mayl 836 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Greenman 825 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Greenman 825 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
When construing a statute, this court is required to consider that “the legislature intends the entire statute to be effective.” (quoting Minn.Stat.
State v. Coleman 808 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Coleman 808 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Storms v. Schneider 802 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Storms v. Schneider 802 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.
State v. Milliman 802 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Milliman 802 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc., (MinnApp.
Mycka v. 2003 GMC Envoy, MN Plate RPG535, VIN 1GKDT13S432414651 783 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Mycka v. 2003 GMC Envoy, MN Plate RPG535, VIN 1GKDT13S432414651 783 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
ch. 570, art. 1, § 15, at 1953-56, because the legislature is presumed to enact statutes with full knowledge of the then-existing caselaw, see Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.
In Re the Welfare of the Child of S.L.J. 772 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Welfare of the Child of S.L.J. 772 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.