DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reider v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11, 728 N.W.2d 246.

34 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeals by Trinity Home Health Care Services and … Minn. 2023
In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeals by Trinity Home Health Care Services and … Minn. 2023
No. 11, (“[W]e cannot add terms that the legislature has omitted.”).
Brandon L. Siems, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
No. 11, d 246, 249 (Minn. 2007) (statutory question).
Oseland by Oseland v. Crow Wing County 928 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 2019
Oseland by Oseland v. Crow Wing County 928 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 2019
No., , 249 (Minn. 2007).
Bridge Investments, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Harstad v. City of Woodbury 902 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Harstad v. City of Woodbury 902 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
No. 11, (rejecting party’s construction of statute because it would “add terms that the legislature has omitted”).
Ansello v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd. 900 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 2017
Ansello v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd. 900 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 2017
Hohlt v. University of Minnesota 897 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 2017
Hohlt v. University of Minnesota 897 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 2017
No. 11, (interpreting provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act is a statutory question that we review de novo).
Gilbertson v. Williams Dingmann, LLC 894 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 2017
Gilbertson v. Williams Dingmann, LLC 894 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 2017
AVR Communications, Ltd., creditors v. American Hearing Systems, Inc., d/b/a Interton, Inc., debtor 868 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
AVR Communications, Ltd., creditors v. American Hearing Systems, Inc., d/b/a Interton, Inc., debtor 868 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gary Ekdahl, Relator v. Independent School District 213, Self-Insured/Riverport Insurance Services 851 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 2014
Gary Ekdahl, Relator v. Independent School District 213, Self-Insured/Riverport Insurance Services 851 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 2014
Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy 840 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2013
Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy 840 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2013
Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass'n 804 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass'n 804 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
No. 11, (statute); Brookfield Trade Ctr., Inc. v. Cnty.
First Minnesota Bank v. Overby Development, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
First Minnesota Bank v. Overby Development, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 780 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 780 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Soderquist v. Universal Services Telecom Tech Inc. 774 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Soderquist v. Universal Services Telecom Tech Inc. 774 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Welfare of the Child of S.L.J. 772 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Welfare of the Child of S.L.J. 772 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Enright v. Lehmann 735 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 2007
Enright v. Lehmann 735 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 2007
No. 11, (equating “special provision” in Minn.Stat.
Sletto v. Wesley Construction, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Sletto v. Wesley Construction, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2007