Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Disciplinary Action Against Plummer, 725 N.W.2d 96.

32 citing documents.

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Ana L. Pena, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0386459 Minn. 2025
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Ana L. Pena, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0386459 Minn. 2025
“The purpose of discipline for professional misconduct is not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.” ().
In re Disciplinary Action Against Upin 904 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 2017
In re Disciplinary Action Against Upin 904 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 2017
In re Disciplinary Action Against Tigue 900 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 2017
In re Disciplinary Action Against Tigue 900 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 2017
Additionally, although we look to similar cases to ensure that the discipline imposed is consistent, we “impose discipline on a case-by-case basis after considering both aggravating and mitigating circumstances.”
In re Disciplinary Action Against Bulmer 899 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 2017
In re Disciplinary Action Against Bulmer 899 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 2017
In re Disciplinary Action Against Eskola 891 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2017
In re Disciplinary Action Against Eskola 891 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2017
Additionally, although we look to similar cases to ensure that the discipline imposed is consistent, we “impose discipline on a case-by-case basis after considering both aggravating and mitigating circumstances.”
In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST James Carl DUCHON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 029925X 888 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2016
In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST James Carl DUCHON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 029925X 888 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2016
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Dale Allen HANSEN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 217840 868 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Dale Allen HANSEN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 217840 868 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 2015
Discipline for professional misconduct is not designed “to punish the attorney, but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct.”
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William L. FRENCH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 131945 864 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William L. FRENCH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 131945 864 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 2015
The purpose of sanctions for professional misconduct “is not to punish the attorney, but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct.”
In re Disciplinary Action Against Griffith 838 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2013
In re Disciplinary Action Against Griffith 838 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2013
In re Disciplinary Action against Ramsay 799 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 2011
In re Disciplinary Action against Ramsay 799 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 2011
In re Disciplinary Action Against Coleman 793 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 2011
In re Disciplinary Action Against Coleman 793 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 2011
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rebeau 787 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 2010
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rebeau 787 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 2010
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Aitken 787 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2010
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Aitken 787 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2010
The purpose of discipline for professional misconduct is not to punish the attorney, but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, *162 and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorney’s.
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Waite 782 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2010
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Waite 782 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2010
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Karlsen 778 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 2010
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Karlsen 778 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 2010
In Re Reinstatement of Jellinger 728 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2007
In Re Reinstatement of Jellinger 728 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2007