A06-1358
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Skelley v. Lucent Technologies
Cited by
- In RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST DeVAUGHN 722 N.W.2d 927 Minn. 2006
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hoff v. Kempton 317 N.W.2d 361
Opinion text
*928 ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 27, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees. BY THE COURT: /s/ Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice