Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson, 739 N.W.2d 424.

83 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld, f/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Hare v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Whether to hold an evidentiary hearing on a motion generally is a discretionary decision of the district court, which we review for an abuse of discretion.”
Shauna Marie Krupicka v. Paul John Hassinger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Shauna Marie Krupicka v. Paul John Hassinger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(discussing motion to reopen dissolution judgment under Minn. Stat. § 518.145, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton v. Herbert Thornton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton v. Herbert Thornton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Amy Christine Olmsted, f/k/a Amy Christine Zarbok v. William Scott Zarbok Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Amy Christine Olmsted, f/k/a Amy Christine Zarbok v. William Scott Zarbok Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Subject to the right of appeal, a dissolution judgment and decree is final when entered, unless in a timely motion a party establishes a statutory basis for reopening the judgment and decree.”
Carleen Kaye Theno, n/k/a Carleen Kaye Starkovich v. John Marvin Theno Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Carleen Kaye Theno, n/k/a Carleen Kaye Starkovich v. John Marvin Theno Minn. Ct. App. 2016
4 “Subject to the right of appeal, a dissolution judgment and decree is final when entered, unless in a timely motion a party establishes a statutory basis for reopening the judgment and decree.” see also Minn. Stat. § 518A.39, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Odelia Castaneda Ortega v. Selwin Ortega Romero Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Odelia Castaneda Ortega v. Selwin Ortega Romero Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The moving party bears the burden of establishing a basis to reopen the judgment and decree.”
In re the Marriage of: Kumiko Olivia Highley v. Christopher Alan Kvaal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kumiko Olivia Highley v. Christopher Alan Kvaal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[W]hether the district court applied the correct legal standard is a question of law, which we review de novo.”
In re the Marriage of: Rachelle Frances Norgren v. Randy Dean Norgren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Rachelle Frances Norgren v. Randy Dean Norgren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The moving party bears the burden of establishing a basis to reopen the judgment and decree.”
In re the Marriage of Mary Ellen Block, f/k/a Mary Ellen Jensen v. William Ray Block Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of Mary Ellen Block, f/k/a Mary Ellen Jensen v. William Ray Block Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Holly Beth Ogilvie, n/k/a Holly Beth Gislason v. John Richard Ogilvie Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Holly Beth Ogilvie, n/k/a Holly Beth Gislason v. John Richard Ogilvie Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jo Ellen M. Healy v. John Henry Healy, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Whether to hold an evidentiary hearing on a motion generally is a discretionary decision of the district court, which [this court] review[s] for an abuse of discretion.”
Thomas Joseph Daley v. Anne Elizabeth Daley, n/k/a Anne E. Patrick-Daley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Holly V. Anderson v. Derrik T. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Holly V. Anderson v. Derrik T. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thomas Joseph Daley v. Anne Elizabeth Daley, n/k/a Anne E. Patrick-Daley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(denying motion to reopen under section 518.145 because the “[h]usband seeks to collaterally attack the district court’s marital-property and spousal- maintenance determinations, having elected to forego participation in the proceedings or to timely file a direct appeal of the judgment and d
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[T]o reopen a judgment and decree because prospective application is no longer equitable, the inequity must result from the development of circumstances substantially altering the information known when the dissolution judgment and decree was entered.” (quotation omitted).
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that a party cannot complain about the district court’s failure to rule in its favor when the party failed to provide evidence for the district court to rule in its favor).
Marriage of Anh Phuong Le v. Holter 838 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Marriage of Anh Phuong Le v. Holter 838 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“Whether to hold an evidentiary hearing on a motion generally is a discretionary decision of the district court, which we review for an abuse of discretion.”
American Bank of St. Paul v. City of Minneapolis 802 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
American Bank of St. Paul v. City of Minneapolis 802 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2011