DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Clark, 739 N.W.2d 412.

65 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Ahavel Abimbola Scherz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    n.4 (Minn. 2007) (“Direct evidence is evidence that is based on personal knowledge or observation and that, if true, proves a fact without inference or presumption.” (quotations omitted)).
  • Gulbertson v. State 843 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2014
  • Gulbertson v. State 843 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2014
    ] that witnesses see an incident of domestic abuse for their testimony to support a pattern of domestic abuse.”
  • Lussier v. State 821 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2012
  • Lussier v. State 821 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2012
    Further, there must be evidence tying the previous acts together into a “ ‘regular way of acting.’ ” (); see also Sanchez-Diaz, d at 832-33 (holding that a “past pattern” was established when (1) there was evidence of one incident in which the defendant choked the victim, (2) the defendant admitted previously slapping the vie- *590 ti
  • State v. Hokanson 821 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2012
  • State v. Hokanson 821 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2012
  • State v. Palmer 803 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Palmer 803 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Johnson 773 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Johnson 773 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 2009
    (holding that events that occurred 13-15 years before later incidents were not part of a pattern).
  • State v. Anderson 763 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Anderson 763 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2009
    (“While we have declined to add a specific temporal requirement to the separate acts of domestic abuse, we have held that ‘the events must be sufficiently proximate in time to constitute a “pattern.” ’ ” (quoting Cross, d at 727 n. 3)).
  • State v. Moua Her 750 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 2008
  • State v. Moua Her 750 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 2008
    The statute does not define the element of “past pattern of domestic abuse,” but we have said that “pattern” means individual incidents of abuse “tie[d] together * * * in a way that indicates that domestic abuse was a ‘regular way of acting’ for [the defendant].” ().