Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. Smith, 754 N.W.2d 377.

138 citing documents.

Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Amaal Mohammed Shire v. Minneapolis Public Housing Authority, Lester L. Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Amaal Mohammed Shire v. Minneapolis Public Housing Authority, Lester L. Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Whether service of process was effective, and personal jurisdiction therefore exists, is a question of law that we review de novo.” Shamrock Dev.
DuPrece Lashae Slaughter v. Anissa Lachelle Black, Lisa Danielle Willis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DuPrece Lashae Slaughter v. Anissa Lachelle Black, Lisa Danielle Willis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Katherine JoAnn Lange, Thomas James Putman v. State Farm Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Katherine JoAnn Lange, Thomas James Putman v. State Farm Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gregory B. Lindwall v. Country Preferred Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gregory B. Lindwall v. Country Preferred Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Shamrock Dev., Inc., v. Smith
Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association 850 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association 850 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Shamrock Dev., (citing Minn. R. Civ.
Koski v. Johnson 837 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Koski v. Johnson 837 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
applies] the underlying factual determinations unless they are clearly erroneous.” (citing Shamrock Dev., (“Whether service of process was effective, and personal jurisdiction therefore exists, is a question of law that we review de novo.”)).
In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd. 835 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 2013
In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd. 835 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 2013
Coker v. Jesson 831 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 2013
Coker v. Jesson 831 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 2013
Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam 814 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2012
Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam 814 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2012
In re the Welfare of R.S. 805 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 2011
In re the Welfare of R.S. 805 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 2011
See Shamrock Dev., (civil procedure); *49 (criminal procedure); (civil appellate procedure).
Dahlin v. Kroening 796 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 2011
Dahlin v. Kroening 796 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 2011
at 724 n. 20; Shamrock Dev., , 380 n. 2 (Minn.2008).
Rodewald v. Taylor 797 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Rodewald v. Taylor 797 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
“Whether service of process was effective, and personal jurisdiction therefore exists, is a question of law that we review de novo.” Shamrock Dev.
In re Disciplinary Action Against Coleman 793 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 2011
In re Disciplinary Action Against Coleman 793 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 2011
Shamrock Development, (citations omitted).
County of Washington v. TMT Land V, LLC 791 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
County of Washington v. TMT Land V, LLC 791 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Dahlin v. Kroening 784 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Dahlin v. Kroening 784 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Buscher v. MONTAG DEVELOPMENT, INC. 770 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Buscher v. MONTAG DEVELOPMENT, INC. 770 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Hornberger v. Wendel 764 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Hornberger v. Wendel 764 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 2009