Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lamah v. Doherty Employment Group, Inc., 737 N.W.2d 595.

22 citing documents.

Derek L. Connolly v. Mechanical Resources, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Linda J. Brown v. Ind School District #2311, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Antonio F. Bragg v. Fairchild Equipment, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Grp., Inc., (“[T]he ULJ was in the best position 11 to assess credibility and weigh the evidence, and we will not second-guess those judgments.”).
Husen A. Guffe v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Grp., Inc., (concluding relator’s substantial rights were not prejudiced where communication problems were immaterial and did not lead to erroneous fact findings).
Linda Blommer v. College of St. Benedict, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Grp., Inc., d 595, 600 (Minn. App. 2007) (“For the limited purpose of applying the statutory exception of section 268.095, subdivision 1(5), we hold that an employee who performs 32 or more hours of service a week is presumptively employed full time.”).
Jack Grew v. Island Investment Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2020
This court reviews a ULJ’s findi ngs of fact “in the light most favorable to the decision” and defers “t o the ULJ when revi ewing credibility and conflicting evidence.” Lamah v. Doherty Emp’t Grp., Inc.
Curtis McCoy v. Peopleready, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Lamah v. Doherty Emp’t Grp., Inc. , -99 (Minn. App. 2007); -41 (Minn. App. 1984) (affirming that employee voluntarily discontinu ed employment where employee worked 5 one day of a two -week job assignment and refused to complete it) .
Nse Umana v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Lamah v. Doherty Emp’t Grp., (concluding that remand was not necessary when relator did not request an interpreter, and the record as a whole d emonstrated that he understood the proceedings); see also Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., (concluding that relator received a fair
Athena Vasquez v. Cook Area Health Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Athena Vasquez v. Cook Area Health Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lamah v. Doherty Emp’t Grp., Inc.
Tanya Jacobs v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tanya Jacobs v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lamah v. Doherty Emp’t Grp., Inc.
Margaret Acker v. Inter City Oil Co., Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Margaret Acker v. Inter City Oil Co., Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See id.; see also Lamah v. Doherty Emp’t Grp., Inc., (explaining that the relator’s evidentiary challenges were without support when it was “unclear what additional evidence or testimony he believes would have been necessary”).
Deborah Brakefield v. IND. School District #2889, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Deborah Brakefield v. IND. School District #2889, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
4, 2014) (to be codified at Minn. R. 3310.2922 (Supp. 2014)); see Lamah v. Doherty Emp’t Group, Inc.
Frederick Wright v. Atterro, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Frederick Wright v. Atterro, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Lamah v. Doherty Emp’t Grp., Inc., (“An employee who has completed an assignment but refuses to accept further assignments is not disqualified from unemployment benefits because the employment relationship has ended and the refusal does not constitute a quit.”).
Michael Robin v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Michael Robin v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In any event, a ULJ may receive “any evidence that possesses probative value, including hearsay.” Minn. R. 3310.2922 (2013); see also Lamah v. Doherty Emp’t. Grp., Inc.
Thao v. Command Center, Inc. 824 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Thao v. Command Center, Inc. 824 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Lamah v. Doherty Emp’t Grp., Inc., -600 (Minn.App.2007).