Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc., 764 N.W.2d 359.
-
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.
781 N.W.2d 578
Minn. 2010
A settlement agreement is a con *582 tract, Ryan v. Ryan, 292 Minn. 52, 55 , and we review the language of the contract to determine the intent of the parties, Valspar Refinish, Inc., v. Gaylord’s, Inc.
- Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen 781 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 2010
-
Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen
781 N.W.2d 880
Minn. 2010
See Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord’s, Inc.
- BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 779 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC
779 N.W.2d 896
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
See Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord’s, Inc., (stating elements of common-law fraud); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 163 (1981) (stating elements of fraud in the execution).