Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Caine, 746 N.W.2d 339.

103 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Kelly Jon Brothers Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jaylin Deshawn Dubose Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kelly Jon Brothers Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Melody June Fay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Melody June Fay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sufficiency of evidence When considering a claim of insufficient evidence, we conduct “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach their verdict.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Alfonzo Benjamin Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alfonzo Benjamin Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION I. When considering a claim of insufficient evidence, we conduct “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach their verdict.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Marcel Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Marcel Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Under that standard, this court conducts “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the [fact-finder] to reach [its] verdict.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jiyaad Jamaal Copeland Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jiyaad Jamaal Copeland Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Keon Malone Mangun Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Keon Malone Mangun Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amy Andrea Horsfield Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amy Andrea Horsfield Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Douglas Ankney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Douglas Ankney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In considering a sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim, our review is “limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the conviction, is sufficient to allow the jurors to reach their verdict.” 3 (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. David Muniz Bustos 861 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jyron Mendale Young Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jyron Mendale Young Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When considering a sufficiency- of-the-evidence claim, this court conducts “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach their verdict.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Rafael O'Toole Watson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rafael O'Toole Watson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION I. When considering a claim of insufficient evidence, we conduct “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach their verdict.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Donald William Laquier Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Donald William Laquier Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tony Don Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tony Don Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When a defendant fails to object to prosecutorial misconduct at trial, he ordinarily forfeits appellate consideration of the issue.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Donald James Helps Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Donald James Helps Minn. Ct. App. 2015
( abrogated in part on other grounds, -96 (Minn. 2005)).
State of Minnesota v. Abdirahman Ali Moallin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Abdirahman Ali Moallin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
District courts have “considerable latitude” in crafting jury instructions and should be reversed only when the instructions “materially misstate[] the law” or are “misleading or confusing on fundamental points of law.”
State of Minnesota v. Ali Mehrallian Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ali Mehrallian Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Levon Spraggins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Levon Spraggins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Christopher Winford Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Christopher Winford Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Brian-Will Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Brian-Will Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jason Paul Krieg Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jason Paul Krieg Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Nelson 812 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Nelson 812 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Andersen 784 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 2010
State v. Graham 764 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2009
State v. Graham 764 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2009
State v. Evans 756 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 2008