A07-0583 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Bartz v. MEADOW LANE HEALTHCARE

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed June 25, 2007 · 733 N.W.2d 776

Cited by

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

AMENDED ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 26, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT: /s/Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice