Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R., 750 N.W.2d 656.

335 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. S. and T. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Matthew J. Covington v. Alyssa Eckstrom, and Eileen Eckstrom, Third Party Intervenor, Dale … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Matthew J. Covington v. Alyssa Eckstrom, and Eileen Eckstrom, Third Party Intervenor, Dale … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Neither the supreme court’s holdings in and nor our holding in require a different conclusion.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. J. M. and A. D. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. J. M. and A. D. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A finding is clearly erroneous when “it is either manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” -61 (Minn. 2008) (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. S. and P. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. S. and P. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The district court’s findings are reviewed for clear error, and “[a] finding is clearly erroneous if it is either manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” -61 (Minn. 2008) (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. v. and B. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. v. and B. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. A.-P. and D. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. A.-P. and D. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[T]he nature of the services which constitute reasonable efforts depends on the problem presented.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B. T., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B. T., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
7 the child.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. J. M. and R. D. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. J. M. and R. D. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Although poor mental health in itself is not a sufficient basis to terminate parental rights, In re Welfare of S.Z., 547 –62 (Minn. 2008), the district court may terminate rights if a parent’s mental illness is likely to lead to a child’s harm.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. D. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. D. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Accordingly, an appellate court will affirm a district court’s termination of parental rights if “at least one statutory ground alleged in the petition is supported by clear and convincing evidence and termination of parental rights is in the child’s best interests.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. S. H. and X. L. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. S. H. and X. L. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellate courts review a district court’s findings of fact to determine whether they are “clearly erroneous.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S. and M. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S. and M. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellate courts will affirm a TPR if “at least one statutory ground alleged in the petition is supported by clear and convincing evidence and termination of parental rights is in the child’s best interests.”
In re the Welfare of the Children of B.M. 845 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Welfare of the Children of B.M. 845 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In other words, “the mental retardation must directly affect the ability to parent.”
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when it “is either manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” -61 (Minn.2008) (quotation omitted).
In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F. 823 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F. 823 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
664 (Minn.2008) (stating that “if at least one statutory ground alleged in the petition is supported by clear and convincing evidence ...
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
A finding is clearly erroneous if it is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” -61 (Minn.2008) (quotation omitted).
In re Welfare of J.W. 807 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re Welfare of J.W. 807 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Termination on the ground of palpable unfitness requires a petitioner to prove “specific conditions existing at the time of the hearing that appear will continue for a prolonged, indefinite period and that are permanently detrimental to the welfare of the child.” ().
In re the Welfare of J.R.B. 805 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Welfare of J.R.B. 805 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In arriving at a solution, the trial court is vested with broad discretionary powers....”) (quotation omitted); -30 (Minn.App.2009) (repeatedly invoking the discretion referred to in Booth in a CHIPS appeal); (stating that appellate courts “defer to the district court’s decision to terminate parental rights”); (stating that “[t]his court gives deference to a trial court’s decision to terminate parental rights”).
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.L.L. 801 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.L.L. 801 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
A finding is clearly erroneous when “it is either manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” -61 (Minn.2008) (quotation omitted).