DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Edwards, 774 N.W.2d 596.

174 citing documents.

  • State v. Rushton 820 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
  • State v. Robideau 817 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
  • State v. Robideau 817 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
    “Substantial and compelling circumstances are those showing that the defendant’s conduct was significantly more or less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the offense in question.” (quotation omitted).
  • State v. Ferguson 808 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 2012
  • State v. Ferguson 808 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 2012
    “In other words, we determined that multiple convictions arising from a single behavioral incident did not violate our rule against double punishment because where multiple victims are involved, a defendant is equally culpable to each victim.”
  • State v. Martinez-Mendoza 804 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Leathers 799 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Leathers 799 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 2011
    4 (2010)); n. 10 (Minn.2009) (noting that an amendment to Minn.Stat.
  • Tucker v. State 799 N.W.2d 583 Minn. 2011
  • Tucker v. State 799 N.W.2d 583 Minn. 2011
    knows or has reason to know that the discharge has caused bodily harm to another person, shall: (1) immediately investigate the extent of the person's injuries; and (2) render immediate reasonable assistance to the injured person.” Although Tucker’s failure to render aid to Garley could constitute an impermissible ground for departure based on an uncharged criminal offense, we need not decide that question because Tucker failed to raise it either before the district court or on appeal, , 248 n.
  • State v. Weaver 796 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
  • State v. Weaver 796 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
    “The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines were created to promote uniformity, proportionality, rationality, and predictability in sentencing.”
  • State v. Robideau 796 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Robideau 796 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 2011
    We review a decision by the district court “to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.” ()
  • State v. Patterson 796 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
  • State v. Patterson 796 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
    (explaining that “[w]here multiple victims are harmed by a defendant’s conduct during a single behavioral incident, that defendant is more culpable than if he had harmed only one victim”).
  • Vickla v. State 793 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 2011
  • Vickla v. State 793 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Yaritz 791 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Yaritz 791 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    ANALYSIS “The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines were created to promote uniformity, proportionality, rationality, and predictability in sentencing.”
  • State v. Ferguson 786 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Ferguson 786 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Robideau 783 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Robideau 783 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2010