Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bartylla, 755 N.W.2d 8.

257 citing documents.

State v. Morales 764 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
the supreme court affirmed the admission of Spreigl evidence of a burglary and assault in the home to prove “identity, absence of mistake, and common scheme or plan” in the trial for a rape and murder that occurred 10 months later.
State v. Anderson 763 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2009
State v. Anderson 763 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2009
Mell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 757 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Mell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 757 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-18 (Minn.2008) (applying the totality-of-the-cireumstances test instead of the “special-need” test to review the warrantless, suspicionless taking of a DNA sample and declining to interpret the state constitution more broadly than the Fourth Amendment in this context).
State v. DeWalt 757 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. DeWalt 757 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-23 (Minn.2008) (deeming as waived criminal appellant’s pro se arguments where they are “lacking in supportive arguments and/or legal authority, and because no prejudicial error ‘is obvious on mere inspection’ ”).