Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bartylla, 755 N.W.2d 8.
- State v. Anderson 763 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2009
- Mell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 757 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Mell v. Commissioner of Public Safety
757 N.W.2d 702
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-18 (Minn.2008) (applying the totality-of-the-cireumstances test instead of the “special-need” test to review the warrantless, suspicionless taking of a DNA sample and declining to interpret the state constitution more broadly than the Fourth Amendment in this context).
- State v. DeWalt 757 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
State v. DeWalt
757 N.W.2d 282
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-23 (Minn.2008) (deeming as waived criminal appellant’s pro se arguments where they are “lacking in supportive arguments and/or legal authority, and because no prejudicial error ‘is obvious on mere inspection’ ”).