A07-1212 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Schmitt v. INNOVATIVE LAWN SYSTEMS, INC.

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed September 26, 2007 · 739 N.W.2d 159

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

*160 ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 24, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT: /s/Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice