Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Business Bank v. Hanson, 769 N.W.2d 285.

41 citing documents.

Leo Gadbois, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Cheryl Orcutt, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
James Russell, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(holding that contractual interpretation is a question of law); Fin Ag, Inc. v. Hufnagle, Inc. , (reviewing legal questions de novo).
North Loop Downtown, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Bank v. Hanson , (M inn.
Siwek Lumber & Millwork, Inc., Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
David Anderson, et al., Plaintiffs, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Gill v. Gill 919 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2018
Timothy Aadland, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Minn. 2018
(stating that we review contract interpretation questions de novo).
In re the Marriage of: Dawn R. Imme, n/k/a Dawn RaNee Edwardson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Leeco, Inc. v. Cornerstone Bank 898 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Leeco, Inc. v. Cornerstone Bank 898 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
With respect to the latter requirement, “the amount owed on a note and the amount secured by a mortgage may be different.”
Charlotte Nelson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Allen Battle v. Auto Sales 1, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Allen Battle v. Auto Sales 1, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Nuvola, LLC v. Morgan Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nuvola, LLC v. Morgan Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2016
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Construction Services, Inc. of Duluth v. Town of Alborn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Brian D. Peterson v. Joyce Marie Deeb Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Construction Services, Inc. of Duluth v. Town of Alborn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Brian D. Peterson v. Joyce Marie Deeb Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Randy L. Brandt v. Wayne E. Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Randy L. Brandt v. Wayne E. Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kalenburg v. Klein 847 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Kalenburg v. Klein 847 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Moen v. Sunstone Hotel Properties, Inc. 818 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Moen v. Sunstone Hotel Properties, Inc. 818 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Inves. P'ship 812 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Inves. P'ship 812 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Graikowski 812 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Graikowski 812 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(indicating that a mortgage is a contract).
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2011
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2011
Id.; -90 (Minn.2009) (interpreting the phrase “[notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein,” to conclude that despite provisions of the contract referencing a larger amount of money, the debt secured by the mortgage was no more than $200,000, the amount listed after the notwithstanding clause).
Bearder v. State 806 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 2011
Bearder v. State 806 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 2011
Roemhildt v. Kristall Development, Inc. 798 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Roemhildt v. Kristall Development, Inc. 798 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Asian Women United of Minnesota v. Leiendecker 789 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Asian Women United of Minnesota v. Leiendecker 789 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Similarly, “[t]he plain and ordinary meaning of the contract language controls, unless the language is ambiguous.”