DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peterson v. Johnson, 755 N.W.2d 758.

137 citing documents.

Gemma Watson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating that the district court’s authority to grant an HRO is statutory and that statutory interpretation is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo).
Samantha Raye Meyer v. Robert J. Harley Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Samantha Raye Meyer v. Robert J. Harley Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Amanda Stokes-Ciochetto, Paul Brian Ciochetto and o/b/o Minor Children v. Devin James Eskeli Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Amanda Stokes-Ciochetto, Paul Brian Ciochetto and o/b/o Minor Children v. Devin James Eskeli Minn. Ct. App. 2017
To establish harassment by “physical assault,” a petitioner must demonstrate that “the respondent intentionally inflicted or attempted to inflict bodily harm 4 upon another person.”
Darcie Gilliard and on behalf of minor children v. Jacob Alton Leatherman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Darcie Gilliard and on behalf of minor children v. Jacob Alton Leatherman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Susan Esther Safstrom v. Justina Elise Morin, and Justina Elise Morin obo minor children v. Susan Esther Safstrom Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Susan Esther Safstrom v. Justina Elise Morin, and Justina Elise Morin obo minor children v. Susan Esther Safstrom Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“One incident of an intrusive or unwanted act is insufficient to prove harassment if there is no infliction of 4 bodily harm or attempt to inflict bodily harm.”).
Lucas Heikkila, individually and o/b/o Minor Children v. Jeff Dietman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Lucas Heikkila, individually and o/b/o Minor Children v. Jeff Dietman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rebecca Lee Treptow v. Brittany Ann Layland Vacko Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Adrianne Robbennolt and obo minor child v. Sandi Weigum Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rebecca Lee Treptow v. Brittany Ann Layland Vacko Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Adrianne Robbennolt and obo minor child v. Sandi Weigum Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION “[T]he issuance of an HRO is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
Joel Inskeep and Chelsea Inskeep and o/b/o L.I. and E.I. v. Sheila Moore, Harry Walk Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Joyce Sammon v. Kim Halvorson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Joyce Sammon v. Kim Halvorson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Joel Inskeep and Chelsea Inskeep and o/b/o L.I. and E.I. v. Sheila Moore, Harry Walk Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But “[c]redibility determinations are the province of the trier of fact.”
Sarah Elizabeth LeBlanc v. Alonzo Marell Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cathie J. Pascavage v. Donald Mackay Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sarah Elizabeth LeBlanc v. Alonzo Marell Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cathie J. Pascavage v. Donald Mackay Minn. Ct. App. 2016
1(a)(1) (2014); (explaining that the statute requires proof of objectively unreasonable conduct on the part of the harasser and an objectively reasonable belief on the part of the person subject to the harassment).
State of Minnesota v. John Everette Pierce Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Everette Pierce Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[T]he issuance of an HRO is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
Joseph F. Johnson v. Glenn Weibel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Joseph F. Johnson v. Glenn Weibel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tyler VanCamp v. Tracey VanCamp Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tyler VanCamp v. Tracey VanCamp Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Terry Anne Boggs v. David Carl Boggs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Terry Anne Boggs v. David Carl Boggs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rachel Marie Davies f/k/a Rachel Marie Mehralian v. Ali Mehralian Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rachel Marie Davies f/k/a Rachel Marie Mehralian v. Ali Mehralian Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating, in an appeal from grant of an HRO, that “[c]redibility determinations are the province of the trier of fact”).
Peter Wells Fischer v. Gene A. Rechtzigel Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Peter Wells Fischer v. Gene A. Rechtzigel Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rew v. Bergstrom 812 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Rew v. Bergstrom 812 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2011