Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Al-Naseer, 788 N.W.2d 469.

635 citing documents.

Richard Allen Gumphrey v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that “the trier of fact is in the best position to determine credibility and weigh the evidence”).
Daniel Peter Frisch v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
warrants heightened scrutiny.”
In re the Civil Commitment of Ince 847 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 2014
In re the Civil Commitment of Ince 847 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 2014
(“We recognize that the trier of fact is in the best position to determine credibility and weigh the evidence.”).
State v. Fairbanks 842 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2014
State v. Fairbanks 842 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2014
State v. Salyers 842 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Salyers 842 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Tayari-Garrett 841 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Tayari-Garrett 841 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(Stras, J., concurring in part) ( (holding that in order for a fact to be proven by circumstantial evidence, we consider whether the reasonable inferences that can be drawn from the circumstances proved support a rational hypothesis other than guilt)).
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Porte 832 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Porte 832 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Hayes 831 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2013
State v. Silvernail 831 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2013
State v. Hayes 831 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2013
State v. Smith 825 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Smith 825 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Hurd 819 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 2012
State v. Hurd 819 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 2012
at 242 (quoting Andersen, d at 329 ); -74 (Minn.2010).
State v. Pratt 813 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 2012
State v. Pratt 813 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 2012
State v. Boldman 813 N.W.2d 102 Minn. 2012
State v. Boldman 813 N.W.2d 102 Minn. 2012
State v. Nelson 812 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Nelson 812 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Palmer 803 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2011
State v. Palmer 803 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2011
State v. Gatson 801 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 2011
State v. Gatson 801 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 2011
Therefore, in assessing the inferences drawn from the circumstances proved, it must be “true that there are no other reasonable, rational inferences that are inconsistent with guilt.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State v. Hanson 800 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 2011
State v. Hanson 800 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 2011
-74 (Minn. 2010); -30 (Minn.2010); (plurality opinion).
State v. Hanson 790 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Hanson 790 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 2010