Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Pendleton, 759 N.W.2d 900.
- State v. Koppi 779 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
- State v. Yang 774 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2009
-
State v. Yang
774 N.W.2d 539
Minn. 2009
Accomplice liability is created when a defendant “was intentionally present at the scene of the crime, knew his accomplices were going to commit a crime, and intended his presence to further that crime.”
- State v. Cruz-Ramirez 771 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2009
-
State v. Cruz-Ramirez
771 N.W.2d 497
Minn. 2009
When reviewing a question on the sufficiency of the evidence, “we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and assume that the fact finder rejected any evidence inconsistent with the verdict.”