Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Holt v. State, 772 N.W.2d 470.

75 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Patricia Ann Shepard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Patricia Ann Shepard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Montalvo Knowles Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. JaJuan Anthony Reed, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. JaJuan Anthony Reed, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Montalvo Knowles Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Larry Leo Geleneau, Jr. 873 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Larry Leo Geleneau, Jr. 873 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jaylin Deshawn Dubose Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jaylin Deshawn Dubose Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Josue Robles Fraga 864 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Josue Robles Fraga 864 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 2015
at 318; see also Williams, d at 28 (declining to extend implied bias to a juror who may have lied about another juror’s racist remarks);8 (declining to extend the doctrine of implied bias where a juror’s home was burgled, but there was no connection between the defendant and the attempted burglary, and the case involved a different type of crime).
State of Minnesota v. Michael Allen Truelove Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael Allen Truelove Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Antonio Alfaro Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Antonio Alfaro Minn. Ct. App. 2014
And “an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal.” n.5 (Minn. 2009) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. La�Rog Daquan Meadows Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. La�Rog Daquan Meadows Minn. Ct. App. 2014
the prior statement, and was available for cross- examination by the defense counsel”; (9) “as the declarant admitted making the statement and the statement was taped, there was no real dispute about what the declarant had said”; 11 and (10) “the statement was against the declarant’s penal interest, which increased its reliability.”
State v. Burrell 837 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 2013
State v. Burrell 837 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 2013
481 n. 5 (Minn.2009) (striking references to a criminal complaint that was outside the record on appeal).
State v. Diggins 836 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 2013
State v. Diggins 836 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 2013
State v. Munt 831 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 2013
State v. Ahmed 782 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Ahmed 782 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“A determination that a statement meets the foundational requirements of a hearsay exception is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”