Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Antrim, 764 N.W.2d 67.

28 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. John Everette Pierce Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Everette Pierce Minn. Ct. App. 2015
4—formerly known as a Lothenbach proceeding, —a defendant must “waive a jury trial on the issue of guilt .
State of Minnesota v. Timothy John Lopp Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Timothy John Lopp Minn. Ct. App. 2015
If a district court fails to “strictly comply” with the waiver requirements of rule 26.01, “the subsequent conviction must be reversed.” Knoll, d at 921; (reversing and remanding for invalid waiver in a rule 26.01, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Larry Dusaun Gray Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Larry Dusaun Gray Minn. Ct. App. 2015
4, effective April 1, 2007, implements and supersedes the procedure authorized by [Lothenbach].”
State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
4, effective April 1, 2007, implements and supersedes the procedure authorized by [Lothenbach].”
State of Minnesota v. Marlon Terrell Pratt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Marlon Terrell Pratt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 67, 71 (Minn. App. 2009).
State of Minnesota v. Emmanuel Maker Galuak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Emmanuel Maker Galuak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-71 (Minn. App. 2009) (reversing and remanding without addressing the pretrial issue that was preserved for review, where defendant had not validly waived his right to require favorable witnesses to testify).
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
For this argument, he relies on three cases: (holding that failure to comply with the waiver requirements of Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Michael Douglas Metsala Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Michael Douglas Metsala Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-71 (Minn. App. 2009); Knoll, d at 921.
State of Minnesota v. Robert Edward Collins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Marquin Lamont Craig Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Marquin Lamont Craig Minn. Ct. App. 2014
4, effective April 1, 2007, implements and supersedes the procedure authorized by [Lothenbach].”
State of Minnesota v. Robert Edward Collins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Christenson 827 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Christenson 827 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Craig 807 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Craig 807 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
to support his argument that the district court’s failure to elicit a valid waiver requires automatic reversal.
State v. Fluker 781 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Fluker 781 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Kuhlmann 780 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Kuhlmann 780 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010