Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Vang, 774 N.W.2d 566.

154 citing documents.

State v. Matthews 779 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2010
State v. Matthews 779 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2010
Further, the prosecutor told the jury in closing argument that “a past pattern has to include at least three prior instances of domestic abuse.” (concluding that even if the district court instructions were incomplete, the State’s closing argument correctly stated the law so that the defendant’s substantial rights were not affected).
State v. Yang 774 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2009
State v. Yang 774 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2009
We have decided another appeal arising from this incident, which involved a separate trial.