Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Swanson v. Brewster, 784 N.W.2d 264.

53 citing documents.

Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Fern Hill Place Homeowners Association, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
When interpreting a statue, we give words and phrases their plain and ordinary meaning and should interpret a statute “to give effect to all of its provisions.” (quotation omitted); (“When interpreting a statute, appellate courts read and construe the statute as a whole, giving effect wherever possible to all of its provisions, and interpreting each section in light of the surrounding se
William Jepsen, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Eric Parker Dean, Minn. 2021
Although we have said that we construe statutes in abrogation of the common law “strictly,” we do not construe them “so narrowly ” that “we disregard the Legislature’s intent.” ().
William Jepsen, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Eric Parker Dean, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 264, 270 (Minn. 2010) (holding that the colla teral-source statute, which prohibits double recoveries in certain cases, partially abroga ted the common-law rule that a plaintiff’s recovery cannot be reduced by certain payments the plaintiff received outside the scope of their case); Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto’s, Inc.
Minn. 2019
“When an individual or entity other than a tortfeasor compensates a tort plaintiff for his or her injuries, the plaintiff has received a ‘collateral-source benefit.’ ”
Aaron Carlson Corporation, Minn. 2019
Gaddisee Gemeda Bedasso, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
– 67, 282 (Minn. 2010); Auers, d at 355–57.
Aaron Carlson Corp. v. Cohen 919 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Aaron Carlson Corp. v. Cohen 919 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Swanson v. Brewster , , 274 (Minn. 2010).
Getz v. Peace 918 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Getz v. Peace 918 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Swanson v. Brewster , , 269 n.7 (Minn. 2010) ; see also Hueper , d at 830 (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 920A, cmt.
Steven Brown, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Swanson v. Brewster , d 264, 273-77 (Minn. 2010).
Jennissen v. City of Bloomington 913 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 2018
Jennissen v. City of Bloomington 913 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 2018
See Swanson v. Brewster , , 284 (Minn. 2010) ("Our primary goal in statutory interpretation is to give effect to the intent of the Legislature.").
Herbert B. Fick, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. Flynn 890 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. Flynn 890 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
586 n.11 (Minn. 2010); -75 (Minn. 2010); In re *431 Phillips’ Trust, 252 Minn. 301, 306
Sandra Castillo as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jose Luis Estrada-Martinez v. American Standard Insurance Company of … 889 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sandra Castillo as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jose Luis Estrada-Martinez v. American Standard Insurance Company of … 889 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Minn. Stat. § 645.16; d 264, 274 (Minn. 2010).
Steven Duane Auers, personally, and as trustee for the next of kin of Karen Auers v. Progressive Direct … 878 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
a negotiated discount of medical expenses is a collateral source subject to offset under Minn. Stat. § 548.251 (2014).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
-73 (Minn.2010) *531 (explaining that what was “at issue in Stout ” were the “phrases and words ‘economic loss benefits,’ ‘medical expense,’ and ‘incurred’ from the No-Fault Act”).
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs 870 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs 870 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Our primary goal in statutory interpretation is to give effect to the intent of the Legislature.”
CitiMortgage, Inc. a successor by merger to ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. v. Sandra Lee Akers, William Lee … 858 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jacquelyn K. Schneewind v. Austin Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jacquelyn K. Schneewind v. Austin Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“When an individual or entity other than a tortfeasor compensates a tort plaintiff for his or her injuries, the plaintiff has received a ‘collateral-source benefit.’” d 264, 268 (Minn. 2010).
State v. Barrientos 837 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2013
State v. Barrientos 837 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2013
In re the Civil Commitment of Moen 837 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Civil Commitment of Moen 837 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“Our primary goal in statutory interpretation is to give effect to the intent of the Legislature.”
Wiley v. Robert Half International, Inc. 834 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Wiley v. Robert Half International, Inc. 834 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“A court must read and construe a statute as a whole and must interpret each section in light of the surrounding sections to avoid conflicting interpretations.” (quotation *570 omitted).
Russell v. Haji-Ali 826 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Russell v. Haji-Ali 826 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Mosloski v. Spencer 825 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Mosloski v. Spencer 825 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
We first must discern the meaning of the terms “will” and “deed.” “Our primary goal in statutory interpretation is to give effect to the intent of the Legislature.”
Renswick v. Wenzel 819 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Renswick v. Wenzel 819 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-69 (Minn.2010) (recounting collateral-source history).
In re the Financial Responsibility for the Out-of-Home Placement Costs for S.M. 812 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
In re the Financial Responsibility for the Out-of-Home Placement Costs for S.M. 812 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
State v. Fitman 811 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Fitman 811 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
586 n. 11 (Minn.2010); see also Minn.Stat.
Troyer v. Vertlu Management Co./Kok & Lundberg Funeral Homes 806 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2011
Troyer v. Vertlu Management Co./Kok & Lundberg Funeral Homes 806 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2011
State v. Milliman 802 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Milliman 802 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
586 n. 11 (Minn.2010); In re Phillips’ Trust, 252 Minn. 301, 306
Graff v. Robert M. Swendra Agency, Inc. 800 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 2011

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by