Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pechovnik v. Pechovnik, 765 N.W.2d 94.

231 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Bradley Jude Domagala, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(noting that “[t]he district court’s findings implicitly indicate that the district court found respondent’s testimony credible” and stating “[w]e defer to this credibility determination”).
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
6 The decision to grant an OFP is within the discretion of the district court, and we generally will not reverse a grant of an OFP absent an abuse of that discretion, Braend ex rel.
In re the Marriage of: Julia Ellen Conlon, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
is within the district court’s discretion,” (quotation omitted), “so we will not reverse absent an abuse of that discretion,” Braend ex rel.
In the Matter of: Lisa Marie Hessel, individually and o/b/o minor children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court abuses its discretion if its findings are unsupported by the record or if it misapplies the law.” Pechovnik v. Pechovnik , (quotations omitted).
In the Matter of: Josephine Pearl Paul, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Sagataw 892 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Sagataw 892 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-99 (Minn. App. 2009) (stating misapplication of the law is an abuse of discretion); (remanding to district court because district court failed to exercise discretion when it, without considering all relevant factors, stated “there [was] no justifiabl
In the Matter of: Bret William Smith v. Timothy Patrick Lyons Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: Tracy Elizabeth Thompson and o/b/o Minor Child v. John Patrick Schrimsher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: Tracy Elizabeth Thompson and o/b/o Minor Child v. John Patrick Schrimsher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
is within the district court’s discretion.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of: Bret William Smith v. Timothy Patrick Lyons Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: Paula Jean Ball, for herself and o/b/o W. v. B. and K. A. R. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Paula Jean Ball, for herself and o/b/o W. v. B. and K. A. R. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Ashley Danielle Martin, individually and o/b/o M. M. F. and M. B. F. v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Ashley Danielle Martin, individually and o/b/o M. M. F. and M. B. F. v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
is within the district court’s discretion.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marria ge of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Colleen Marie Siverling v. Dominic Andrew Bjerke Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marria ge of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Conflicts in the evidence, even though the presentation is upon affidavits, are to be resolved by the trial court.” (footnote omitted)); (noting that “[t]he district court’s findings implicitly indicate that the district court found respondent’s testimony credible” and stating that “[w]e defer to this credibility determination”).
In the Matter of: Colleen Marie Siverling v. Dominic Andrew Bjerke Minn. Ct. App. 2016
is within the district court’s discretion.” (quotation omitted).
DRB 24, LLC, on behalf of itself and other similarly situated property owners in Minneapolis that have been … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DRB 24, LLC, on behalf of itself and other similarly situated property owners in Minneapolis that have been … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
at 331 (discussing the collateral consequences of civil commitment); Morrissey v. State, 286 Minn. 14, 16, (discussing the collateral consequences of a criminal conviction); (discussing the collateral consequences of OFP on divorce proceedings).
Kerry M. Mokalla, on behalf of A.M. and A.M. v. Mani M. Mokalla Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kerry M. Mokalla, on behalf of A.M. and A.M. v. Mani M. Mokalla Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randal v. Johnson v. Robert A. Fischer, County of Sibley Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randal v. Johnson v. Robert A. Fischer, County of Sibley Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(noting that the district court’s findings “implicitly indicate[d]” that it found certain testimony credible).
Adrianne Robbennolt and obo minor child v. Sandi Weigum Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Adrianne Robbennolt and obo minor child v. Sandi Weigum Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(noting that the district court’s findings “implicitly indicate[d]” that it found certain evidence credible).
In the Matter of: Carrie Ann Seibert, individually and o/b/o C. A. A. and C. C. A. v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Carrie Ann Seibert, individually and o/b/o C. A. A. and C. C. A. v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Matter of: Heather Ray Klammer v. Luke Stephen Klammer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Matter of: Heather Ray Klammer v. Luke Stephen Klammer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A district court abuses its discretion if its findings are unsupported by the record or if it misapplies the law.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney v. Barry Ishmael McReynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney v. Barry Ishmael McReynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Danielle Ann Schanze v. Daniel Frederick Schanze Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of: Danielle Ann Schanze v. Daniel Frederick Schanze Minn. Ct. App. 2015
is within the district court’s discretion.” (quotation omitted).
Mark Michael Dwyer v. Tamara Jo Molde Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mark Michael Dwyer v. Tamara Jo Molde Minn. Ct. App. 2015
6 (inferring, in the context of an appeal in a domestic abuse proceeding, an implicit finding regarding witness credibility).
In the Matter of: Ashley Elisabeth Boecker o/b/o C. E. L. and M. T. L. v. Correy Michael … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of: Ashley Elisabeth Boecker o/b/o C. E. L. and M. T. L. v. Correy Michael … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A “district court abuses its discretion if its findings are unsupported by the record or if it misapplies the law.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Jaime Dawn Starren v. Jason Charles Starren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jaime Dawn Starren v. Jason Charles Starren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(recognizing that a district court made an implicit 6 finding regarding the respondent’s credibility when it ruled in her favor despite conflicting testimony).
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Scott Junker Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Scott Junker Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“If an issue involves only a hypothetical possibility, then the issue is not justiciable because neither the ripe nor the ripening seeds of a controversy are present.” (Quotation omitted.)); (“Appellate courts decide only actual controversies and avoid advisory opinions.” (Quotation omitted.)).
In the Matter of: Stanislav Kopylov v. Tatiana Kopylov Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of: Stanislav Kopylov v. Tatiana Kopylov Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Sara Marie Gasper o/b/o A. R. G., A. J. G. and A. L. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Sara Marie Gasper o/b/o A. R. G., A. J. G. and A. L. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that district court may infer a present intent to commit domestic abuse against one family member based on the totality of the circumstances, including previous abusive behavior).
Ryan Contracting Company v. O'Neill & Murphy, LLP 868 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 2015