Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLC, 773 N.W.2d 783.
- State of Minnesota v. Dylan Micheal Kelley 855 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 2014
- Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Constr., LLC, –88 (Minn. 2009) (stating that “[r]ule 104.01 refers only to a Final judgment” and referring to “a final partial judgment pursuant to Minn. R. Civ.
- Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. 851 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2014
-
Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
851 N.W.2d 598
Minn. 2014
Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Constr., LLC, , 787 n. 3 (Minn.2009) (“Where the language of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is similar to language in the Minnesota civil procedure rules, federal cases on the issue are instructive.”).
- TC/American Monorail, Inc. v. Custom Conveyor Corp. 840 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2013
-
TC/American Monorail, Inc. v. Custom Conveyor Corp.
840 N.W.2d 414
Minn. 2013
Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Constr., LLC
- Weiss v. Private Capital, LLC 839 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
Weiss v. Private Capital, LLC
839 N.W.2d 106
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bohr Constr., LLC
- Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC 837 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC
837 N.W.2d 733
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Constr., LLC
- T & R Flooring, LLC v. O'Byrne 826 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
T & R Flooring, LLC v. O'Byrne
826 N.W.2d 833
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Constr., LLC
- Phillips v. LaPlante 823 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
Phillips v. LaPlante
823 N.W.2d 903
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Constr., LLC, a mechanic’s lien action, the district court *906 administrator entered two judgments.
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Erlandson 821 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Erlandson
821 N.W.2d 600
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Const., LLC, (noting that, generally, to be appealable, a judgment must be final and that a final judgment is one that ends the litigation on the merits, leaving the court nothing to do but execute the judgment).
- United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
- D.Y.N. Kiev, LLC v. Jackson 802 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-
D.Y.N. Kiev, LLC v. Jackson
802 N.W.2d 821
Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Constr., LLC