Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Andersen, 784 N.W.2d 320.

590 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Donald Ernest Beckman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dayna Kristine Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dayna Kristine Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
To support a conviction, “the circumstances proved must be consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt.”
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Otto Boyum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Otto Boyum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[W]e will not overturn a conviction based on circumstantial evidence on the basis of mere conjecture.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Devon Scott Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Devon Scott Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Hunter Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Hunter Minn. Ct. App. 2014
To support a conviction, “the circumstances proved must be consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt.”
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Lynch Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Michael Krall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Lynch Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Michael Krall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. William Harold Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. William Harold Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Marsenior Pede Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Marsenior Pede Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Moreover, in examining the record for reasonable inferences, we will not overturn a conviction “on the 7 basis of mere conjecture.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Katherine Trinka Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Katherine Trinka Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Daniel Peter Frisch v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Daniel Peter Frisch v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Moore 846 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2014
State v. Moore 846 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2014
State v. Pederson 840 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Pederson 840 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Eichers 840 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Eichers 840 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Under Franks, “a search warrant is void, and the fruits of the search must be excluded, if the application includes intentional or reckless misrepresentations of fact material to the findings of probable cause.” (quotation omitted); accord Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 171-72 , 98 S.Ct.
State v. Essex 838 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Essex 838 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
When reviewing a conviction based on circumstantial evidence, we must *810 first “identify the circumstances proved” by the evidence, deferring to “the jury’s acceptance of the proof of these circumstances and rejection of evidence in the record that conflicted with the circumstances proved by the [sjtate.” (quotations omitted).
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Sterling 834 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2013
State v. Sterling 834 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2013
State v. Porte 832 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Porte 832 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Hayes 831 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2013
State v. Silvernail 831 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2013
State v. Hayes 831 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2013
-42 (Minn.2010) () (internal citations omitted).
State v. Silvernail 831 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2013
Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
State v. Scruggs 822 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 2012
State v. Scruggs 822 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 2012
State v. Hokanson 821 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2012
State v. Hokanson 821 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2012
Because the State attempted to prove the other incidents of malicious punishment based solely on circumstantial evidence, -30 (Minn.2010).
State v. Montermini 819 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Montermini 819 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Hurd 819 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 2012
State v. Hurd 819 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 2012
Fain v. Andersen 816 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 2012